Defective Chinese Drywall
Problems (11/09)
Builders and environmental
consultants began investigating Chinese drywall
after reports that the potentially toxic drywall
caused unpleasant (rotten egg) odors. A class action lawsuit
by homeowners affected with Chinese drywall is scheduled to
be heard in September 2010 and is being called the largest
construction defect case in U.S. History.
-
23 states had reported 681 cases
of health problems and/or metal corrosion associated with
Chinese drywall. (July 30, 2009 per Florida Department of
Health and US Consumer Product Safety Commission
-
Those states hardest hit are
Florida, Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia and Virginia, but
complaints from Arizona and California are also
increasing.
Consumers in 24 states have filed a
total of 1,174 Chinese drywall complaints with the
Consumer Products Safety
Commission (CPSC). A CPSC spokesman said the agency
has identified a "handful" of Chinese drywall makers that
supplied the suspect drywall, although the agency hasn't
publicly named them. The agency's investigators visited
gypsum mines and drywall facilities in China in August.
-
Drywall plasterboard
manufactured in China was first introduced to the United
States in 2000 or early 2001 with spike increase 2004 and
2006. It is estimated at least 550 million pounds
of Chinese drywall has been imported. Major ports
of entry include Miami and Port Everglades, FL, Long
Beach and Oakland, CA, Seattle and Tacoma, WA, and
Vancouver, British Columbia.
The Chinese drywall, also known as
gypsum or wallboard, is under investigation for emitting
sulfide fumes suspected of causing the homeowner complaints.
Chinese drywall was manufactured with a fly ash which is the
residue generated from the combustion of coal. The fly ash,
when exposed to heat and humidity, emits a noxious gas
containing sulfur. Sulfur compounds accelerate corrosion.
Lawsuits allege fumes from the
defective Chinese drywall have resulted in corrosion damages
to all metal parts of the house including electrical systems,
copper piping, HVAC and other metal fixtures. Non metal parts
of the house have been damaged by foul smelling and noxious
sulfur dioxide fumes. Homeowner complaints include
respiratory problems, bloody noses and recurrent headaches.
Lawsuits
Lennar Corp. v. Knauf
Plasterboard Tanjin Co., et al.,: This
was the first Chinese drywall lawsuit filed. It was
filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of
Florida filed on January 30, 2009 against the
manufacturer Knauf Plasterboard Tianjin, the German parent
company, The Knauf Group, Banner Supply, a Florida supplier
and a China based exporter Rothchilt International Ltd., and
Lennar the builder. The suit claimed defendants made
deficient and defective gypsum drywall, failed to establish
quality control for detecting defects and failed to warn
their customers that the drywall was defective.
Harrell v. South Kendall
Construction Corp.: This is a class
action law suit filed in state court in Miami-Dade County,
FL.
Reisz, et al., v. Knauf Plasterboard
Tianjin Col, et al.: Class action filed in U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of Florida
Vickers, et al., v. Knauf Gips KG
et al: Class action filed in U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Swidler et al. v.
Georgia-Pacific, et al: The plaintiffs claim
that Georgia-Pacific manufacturer's American-made
drywall using synthetic drywall similar to that found in
Chinese drywall.
Litigation is occurring between
homebuilders and manufacturers and distributors. It is
expected that litigation between homeowners and their
insurance companies will occur as well. Owners and
property managers of commercial residential properties are
putting insurance carriers on notice with claim reports like
this:
As of September 28, 2006 the
residents occupying unit 3123 noticed an unusual smell during
their move-in. The resident then notified the office that
their silverware had become very tarnished a few months after
moving in. Also, the resident said that they had smelled a
metallic acid smell in the apartment and the wife was feeling
ill.
As of 2007, the resident made a
work order request due to their air conditioning cooling
improperly. During inspection of the a/c unit, it was noted
that there was a leak detected in the a/c coil causing the
freon to escape the system. This was highly unusual that a
new unit less than a year old would show this defect.
Thinking it was a manufactures defect the coil was replaced
with a new one. After this repair the a/c unit did not show
anymore signs of trouble during the rest of 2007 and the
whole of 2008.
As of the beginning of 2009, the
resident requested service for his water heater. He stated
that it was not heating up the water properly. This unit was
only two and a half years old and we determined that the
thermostats and elements would need to be replaced. During
the repair we noticed that the thermostats were corroded and
falling apart and the heating elements were corroded inside
and out. This was very strange for them to look like this for
such a new water heater.
As of July of 2009, the resident
called in a work request that his a/c was not cooling
sufficiently. During the maintenance repair of the a/c unit a
leak was detected in the coil that was replaced in 2007. Upon
a visual inspection of the coil, we noticed that the copper
tubing on the coil was showing major signs of corrosion and
deterioration. The coil was replaced but we suspected that
there was something seriously wrong in this unit.
As of September 29, 2009 the
residents moved out of the unit. We took this opportunity to
do a full visual inspection of the apartment. We noticed that
the copper wiring in all of the light fixtures were showing
the same signs of black corrosion that was spotted on the a/c
coil tubing and water heater thermostats/elements. We then
went online to do a search on copper turning black and what
could cause it. We then got a result that it could be
Chinese Drywall. So we then proceeded to cut a hole in a
wall that was replaced during renovation, and saw in big
print CHINA on the back of the section of drywall.
According to the National
Underwriterbased on Publicly available information and
experience in estimating past construction-related torts, we
estimate total economic losses could fall in the $15 billion
to $25 billion range-numbers that rival some hurricanes but
fall short of the price tag for asbestos. As for legal fees,
we know from other construction defect experience that can be
substantial, representing on average 40-to-50% of the total
claim costs.
Civil judgments in U.S. courts are
not enforced in China, and suing through international court
is expensive and time-consuming.
House and Senate Democrats are
currently investigating whether Chinese drywall problems will
qualify homeowners for special tax deductions under casualty
loss tax code laws, and some senators are calling for a
Chinese drywall recall.